<div align="center">
🔥 GeniusMCP
Quality-aware code intelligence that turns GitHub search into ranked, explainable, import-ready recommendations.
   
<br/>
Not another grep. An intelligence layer.
Quick Start · How It Works · Soul · Tools · Architecture
</div>
---
The Problem
Every code search tool answers "where is this string?"
None of them answer "what is the _best_ implementation, why, and can I safely use it?"
When you ask genius.hunt("retry with backoff"), GeniusMCP returns:
Archetype 1 — Minimal inline helper
✅ 12 LOC, zero deps, copy-paste ready
Exemplar: owner/repo — score 0.87 (battle_tested)
Why: test-adjacent, MIT license, 3 years stable
Archetype 2 — Configurable utility
✅ Options-driven, max attempts + jitter strategy
Exemplar: owner/repo2 — score 0.82
Why: 14K stars, active maintenance, comprehensive docs
Archetype 3 — Middleware pattern
✅ Express/Fastify compatible, interceptor-based
Exemplar: owner/repo3 — score 0.79
Tradeoff: framework-coupled
Coverage: 3 sources searched, 2 blind spots, confidence: 0.83
That's the gap GeniusMCP fills.
---
✨ Key Features
| Feature | What it does | |---------|-------------| | 🎯 Archetype Search | Finds 3-5 structural families, not 200 raw matches | | 📊 6-Bucket Quality Scoring | queryFit · durability · vitality · importability · codeQuality · evidenceConfidence | | 🔍 Multi-Source Discovery | grep.app (free, 1M repos) + GitHub Code Search (200M repos) + searchcode (75B lines) | | 🧬 3-Level Dedup | Exact SHA → normalized AST hash → winnowing fingerprint families | | 📜 Provenance-First Import | License gate · dependency closure · policy checks · attribution | | 🧠 Persistent Memory | Every search enriches local evidence graph. Session 50 is smarter than session 1. | | 🪝 Auto-Capture Hooks | Claude Code hooks capture patterns from every file you read/write | | 💉 Pre-Prompt Injection | Relevant memories injected BEFORE the AI responds | | 🏗️ 7 Archetype Categories | minimal · configurable · middleware · context-aware · distributed · enterprise · wrapper | | 📋 Transparent Uncertainty | Every result shows blind spots + evidence confidence | | ⚡ Tiered Responses | L1 (80 tokens) / L2 (300) / L3 (2000) — adaptive detail level per result count | | 🛡️ Circuit Breakers | Per-source fault isolation: GitHub/grep.app/searchcode fail independently | | 🎰 Thompson Sampling | Multi-armed bandit learns which sources produce best results per query type | | 🔤 SAC Matching | getUserSession finds get_user_session — cross-convention identifier similarity | | 📦 Signature Compression | Repomix-style 70% token reduction — strips bodies, keeps signatures | | 🔍 Dynamic Discovery | forge_discover("search code") — find tools by intent, not memorize 28 names |
---
🏆 Why GeniusMCP
| | GitHub MCP | grep.app MCP | DeusData | GeniusMCP | |---|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | Multi-source search | 1 source | 1 source | local only | 3 sources | | Quality scoring | no | no | no | 6-bucket | | License verification | no | no | no | yes | | Import with provenance | no | no | no | yes | | Persistent memory | no | no | knowledge graph | Bayesian + decay | | Cross-convention matching | no | no | no | SAC algorithm | | Fault tolerance | no | no | no | circuit breakers | | Token efficiency | no | no | no | L1/L2/L3 tiers |
---
🚀 Quick Start
# 1. Clone and install
git clone https://github.com/geniussigmaskibidi-gif/geniusmcp
cd geniusmcp && pnpm install && pnpm build
# 2. Optional: GitHub auth (enables GitHub Code Search + metadata)
export GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_your_token
Add to Claude Code (.mcp.json in your project root)
{
"mcpServers": {
"forgemcp": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/forgemcp/apps/mcp-server/dist/index.js"],
"env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "ghp_your_token" }
}
}
}
Server auto-indexes your project on start. code.reach, code.map, code.symbols work immediately.
Optional: Claude Code Hooks (auto-capture + injection)
{
"hooks": {
"PostToolUse": [
{ "matcher": "Read|Write|Edit", "command": "node hooks/genius-capture.js" }
],
"UserPromptSubmit": [
{ "command": "node hooks/genius-inject.js" }
]
}
}
---
💡 Usage Examples
Find the best implementation of a concept
You: "Find me a good rate limiter implementation"
Agent calls: genius.hunt("rate limiter", language: "typescript", tier: "L1")
→ 5 ranked archetypes in 130 tokens, with stars/license/test signals
Import code with license verification
You: "Import that circuit breaker from the best result"
Agent calls: import.extract("owner/repo", "src/circuit-breaker.ts", symbol: "CircuitBreaker")
→ Full code + MIT license verified + provenance hash + attribution comment
Compare approaches across repos
You: "Should I use Zod or Ajv for validation?"
Agent calls: research.deep_compare("validation", ["colinhacks/zod", "ajv-validator/ajv"])
→ Side-by-side: Zod 42K stars vs Ajv 14K, both MIT+CI, structured quality signals
Remember and recall across sessions
Session 1: genius.hunt("retry backoff") → auto-stores top 3 results
Session 2: memory.recall("retry") → instant recall, no API calls needed
Explore unfamiliar repository
You: "How does Hono handle errors?"
Agent calls: research.archaeology("honojs/hono", "error handling")
→ Found .onError() handler, JWT error middleware, 29K stars, TypeScript
Read soul.md for the complete AI agent reasoning guide — search strategies, anti-patterns, and token budget optimization.
---
🔄 How It Works
graph TD
Q["genius.hunt('retry backoff')"] --> C[QueryCompiler]
C --> |grep.app queries| G[grep.app MCP]
C --> |GitHub queries| GH[GitHub Code Search]
C --> |hydration queries| SC[searchcode.com]
G --> D[Dedup Engine]
GH --> D
SC --> D
D --> |"180 hits → 60 blobs"| E[Symbol Extractor]
E --> F[Winnowing Fingerprint]
F --> |"60 → 8 families"| CL[Archetype Classifier]
CL --> R[Quality Scorer]
R --> |"6-bucket ranking"| OUT["3-5 ranked archetypes<br/>with explanations"]
OUT --> MEM[(Evidence Graph<br/>SQLite)]
MEM --> |"next search: instant recall"| Q
The Magic Loop
Session 1: "Find best rate limiter" → searches 3 sources → 60 unique blobs → 5 archetypes
→ Results cached in evidence graph
Session 2: "Rate limiter for Express" → local memory: 40 instant hits + 20 new
→ Faster, smarter, more relevant
Session 10: "Throttle middleware" → 120 cached patterns, <100ms response
→ Compound intelligence
---
🛠️ Tools (28 MCP Tools)
🎯 Hunt Intelligence (flagship)
| Tool | Description | |------|------------| | genius.hunt | Find best implementations with archetype clustering, quality scoring, coverage report | | genius.explain | Full signal breakdown: why this ranked #1 | | genius.compare | Head-to-head comparison with bucket deltas | | genius.import | Policy-aware import with provenance manifest |
🧠 Memory (compound intelligence)
| Tool | Description | |------|------------| | memory.recall | Search past patterns by concept | | memory.store | Save pattern to persistent memory | | memory.evolve | Create improved version linked to parent | | memory.related | Find connected patterns | | memory.link | Create relationships between patterns | | memory.stats | Memory size, coverage, confidence distribution | | memory.forget | Remove outdated patterns |
🧭 Code Navigation (1 call = 10 Read/Greps)
| Tool | Description | |------|------------| | code.reach | Jump to symbol with full context: callers, callees, deps | | code.map | Instant project architecture map | | code.trace | Call chain between functions | | code.understand | Compressed module understanding | | code.symbols | All exports with signatures |
🔬 Research (persistent reasoning chains)
| Tool | Description | |------|------------| | research.archaeology | Trace code evolution | | research.deep_compare | Structured comparison with metrics | | research.start_chain | Begin research thread | | research.add_step | Record reasoning step | | research.conclude | Mark chain completed | | research.recall_chain | Search past research |
🐙 GitHub
| Tool | Description | |------|------------| | github.search_repos | Search by query, language, stars | | github.search_code | Code search across GitHub | | github.repo_overview | Stars, CI, license, health | | github.repo_file | Get file content | | github.repo_tree | Recursive file tree |
---
🏗️ Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GeniusMCP Server │
│ │
│ Layer 1: DISCOVERY │
│ grep.app MCP · GitHub Code Search API │
│ │
│ Layer 2: HYDRATION │
│ GitHub Trees/Contents · searchcode analysis │
│ │
│ Layer 3: EVIDENCE GRAPH │
│ SourceHit → Blob → SymbolSlice → PatternFamily │
│ │
│ Layer 4: PATTERN INTELLIGENCE │
│ 3-level dedup · archetype classifier · scorer │
│ │
│ Layer 5: IMPORT & POLICY │
│ License gate · provenance · dep closure │
│ │
│ Layer 6: EVALUATION │
│ Coverage confidence · blind spots · metrics │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Quality Scoring (RFC v2)
overall = 0.35 × queryFit + 0.50 × qualityComposite + 0.15 × evidenceConfidence
qualityComposite = weights[preset] × {durability, vitality, importability, codeQuality}
Presets: battle_tested · modern_active · minimal_dependency · teaching_quality
Hard caps: snippet_only → evidence ≤ 0.60 · archived → vitality ≤ 0.20 · license_unknown → importability ≤ 0.20
---
📦 Monorepo Structure
forgemcp/
packages/
core/ — Types, config, errors (Zod-validated)
db/ — SQLite WAL, blob store, search index, evidence graph
ast-intelligence/ — Symbol extraction, call graph, architecture detection
repo-memory/ — Bayesian confidence + Ebbinghaus decay engine
github-gateway/ — Octokit + 4-bucket rate governor + ETag cache
data-sources/ — grep.app + searchcode + source orchestrator
hunt-engine/ — Winnowing, clustering, scoring, archetype classifier
importer/ — License policy + provenance + style adaptation
apps/
mcp-server/ — MCP server + 5 skill modules + hook daemon + dynamic tools
hooks/ — Claude Code auto-capture scripts
tests/ — 252 tests (vitest)
.github/workflows/ — CI (Node 20/22, build + typecheck + test)
---
🧪 Testing
npx vitest run
# 22 test suites, 252 tests, all passing (<1s)
| Suite | Tests | What it covers | |-------|-------|---------------| | foundation | 19 | ForgeResult, Logger, Health, Context | | blob-store | 10 | Content-addressable storage, dedup, file refs | | blob-lifecycle | 11 | GC, pinning, integrity scrub | | symbol-extractor | 13 | TypeScript, Python, Go extraction + fingerprinting | | parser-registry | 6 | Multi-backend precision routing | | search-index | 4 | FTS5 trigram, BM25, RRF fusion | | simhash | 14 | Near-duplicate detection, Hamming distance | | chunker | 8 | Semantic code chunking, symbol boundaries | | query-planner | 14 | Query classification, lane planning | | ranking-v2 | 13 | BM25F weights, retrieval scoring, lexical+structural | | memory-engine | 15 | Store, recall, capture, Bayesian confidence, Ebbinghaus decay | | memory-v2 | 6 | L1/L2/L3 capsule builder, token estimation | | call-graph | 9 | 2-pass resolution, BFS reachability, path tracing | | winnowing | 12 | Fingerprints, Jaccard similarity, clone clustering | | policy-engine | 11 | 4-mode import policy, license gates, provenance | | evidence-graph | 8 | v2 schema: query runs, slices, families, versioned scores | | job-queue | 10 | Durable job queue, priority, backoff, dead-letter | | circuit-breaker | 19 | Circuit breaker state machine, bulkhead, resilient search | | token-budget | 22 | Token estimation, tier selection, truncation, compression | | source-selector | 5 | Thompson Sampling, convergence, discounting | | early-terminator | 6 | Welford online stats, adaptive saturation | | sac | 17 | Subword Affine Canonicalization, cross-convention matching |
---
🎯 Design Principles
- Evidence, not opinions — every score has signals you can inspect
- Local-first — works offline for indexed repos
- Zero ML in core — lexical + structural, semantic is opt-in
- Provenance always — every import traced to source + license
- Progressive learning — every search enriches the evidence graph
- Transparent uncertainty — blind spots shown, not hidden
---
📊 Tech Stack
| Component | Technology | |-----------|-----------| | Protocol | MCP SDK 1.28 (stdio + Streamable HTTP) | | Database | SQLite (WAL mode, better-sqlite3) | | Search | FTS5 trigram + BM25F + Reciprocal Rank Fusion | | AST | Regex multi-language + ast-grep upgrade path | | Dedup | Winnowing fingerprints (Schleimer 2003) + Jaccard clustering | | GitHub | Octokit + throttling + retry + 4-bucket rate governor | | External | grep.app MCP + searchcode.com | | Validation | Zod | | Resilience | Circuit breakers + bulkheads + decorrelated jitter | | Ranking | SAC cross-convention matching + Thompson Sampling source routing | | Token Efficiency | L1/L2/L3 tiered responses + signature compression | | Tests | Vitest (252 tests, <1s) | | Monorepo | pnpm + Turborepo |
---
📄 License
MIT
---
<div align="center">
Built for AI agents that never forget.
Report Bug · Request Feature · Discussions
</div>











